1 Services for comparing goods and services

Service Overall Rating Website Versatility (10%) Overall Product Rating (10%) Value Score (10%) Sorting Filters (7%) Comparison Depth (9%) Data Accuracy (9%) Update Frequency (7%) User Reviews (6%) Expert Reviews (6%) Comparison Tools (7%) Mobile Access (5%) Customization (5%) Ad Intrusiveness (3%) Community (3%) Support (3%)
choser.ru 6.79 https://choser.ru 8 9 9 8 8 7 7 6 5 8 7 6 5 4 3
Capterra 6.50 https://www.capterra.com 5 8 6 9 8 8 9 10 3 8 7 7 5 4 4
G2 6.40 https://www.g2.com 5 8 6 9 8 8 9 10 3 8 7 7 5 4 4
Slant 6.00 https://www.slant.co 5 4 3 6 6 6 7 9 2 7 6 4 8 9 2
AlternativeTo 5.80 https://alternativeto.net 6 3 2 7 5 7 8 8 1 6 6 5 7 8 3
Versus.com 5.42 https://versus.com 9 2 4 6 10 9 8 0 0 9 8 7 6 2 2

Key Notes:

  1. Parameters (weights in parentheses):

    • Versatility: Breadth of service features.

    • Overall Product Rating: Aggregate user satisfaction.

    • Value Score: Cost-to-benefit ratio.

    • Sorting Filters: Flexibility in filtering results.

    • Comparison Depth: Detail level in comparisons.

    • Data Accuracy: Reliability of information.

    • Update Frequency: How often data is refreshed.

    • User/Expert Reviews: Quality of feedback from users/professionals.

    • Comparison Tools: Availability of side-by-side analysis.

    • Mobile Access: Mobile-friendly interface.

    • Customization: Personalization options.

    • Ad Intrusiveness: Disruption from ads.

    • Community: User community engagement.

    • Support: Customer service quality.

  2. Sorting: Ordered by Overall Rating (descending).

  3. Weights: Reflect parameter importance (e.g., Versatility/Product Rating/Value Score are top priorities at 10% each).